Just Because You’re Paranoid

By 19 May 2017KEY ARTICLES
Just Because You’re Paranoid

Just Because You're Paranoid (±x)

Published on 19 May, 2017
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram CISSP FBCS MIEEE MIScT MINCOSE MACS Snr CP

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
1080

Enter more text here

Summary

This article is about blatant Fundamental Human Rights violations. It centres around my absolutely correct identification of MI5 overseeing the unlawful interception and storage of my data communications by NCIS in 1999/2000.

I was branded paranoid at the time despite there being no evidence to confirm that I was actually paranoid. Of course NCIS denied my allegations and that was despite my forensic evidence, which no-one was interested in analysing and/or could understand.

Unfortunately similar events using IMSI catchers occurred in late 2015. After I correctly identified interception again, I was labelled with paranoid schizophrenia, assaulted, kidnapped and unlawfully imprisoned in a Psychiatric Facility on 17 December 2015 by Edward de Saram and Praxy de Saram.

Edward de Saram, a UK Psychiatrist under a medical malpractice investigation at the time, had intentionally inflicted emotional distress a couple of weeks earlier. His fraudulent fabrication of the symptoms of schizophrenia, was in the furtherance of the overall fraud of destruction of evidence.

By leveraging upon the incorrect [yet plausible] articles on Google my Fundamental Human Rights were continually violated and no-one assisted me.

However given the fact that I do not have paranoid schizophrenia I managed to get out lawfully thanks to the excellent work of armed officers of the Sri Lanka Police…

It took SIXTEEN YEARS for the UK Investigatory Powers Tribunal to finally confirm in October 2016 that MI5 had in fact been UNLAWFULLY COLLECTING the data of UK citizens during the 1999/2000 period which specifically confirmed

I HAD BEEN RIGHT ALL ALONG AND HAD NOT BEEN PARANOID

much to the dismay of all the many people who enjoy using the [bogus] paranoid schizophrenia theme as a method to discredit me and/or my forensic evidence in 2017 🙂

28 November 2000 – UK Daily Mail

I gave an interview to Richard Shears of the Daily Mail, following which an article appeared. First of all I NEVER owed GBP 1 million and I did NOT run away – that is garbage. The rest of the article is not too bad and my analysis is below:-

An excerpt from that article is:-

“Yesterday [Joe de Saram] claimed his expertise had made him ‘a thorn in Big Brother’s eye’. He said: ‘What I’ve developed will protect everyone’s personal emails. Can you imagine what this means to a Government which has just introduced legislation known as the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act with the intention of ordering anyone and everyone to reveal their email password whenever asked?

But it goes further than that. We know MI5 is building a multimillion pound facility to monitor all email sent and received in Britain. With my technology they won’t be able to read anything.

Joe is British to the Bone

However being ‘British to the Bone’ apparently meant nothing if I am working on Weaponised Cryptographic Technology for Americans and Israelis – a couple of MI5 officers knew my work was sanctioned but they said nothing when others were helping NCIS make a nuisance of themselves.

Unfortunately it was always wheels within wheels. People laughed at me and were believing the lies coming out of the National Criminal Intelligence Service (“NCIS”) clowns who put ‘boobs on the ground‘ (ha ha) running the harassment surveillance along with HM Customs & Excise (“HMCE”).

Obviously everyone denied any involvement and that is when the name-calling started, as the parties running the frauds were more credible than I and of course they were ‘official’ which automatically meant I was completely wrong and should have known my place.

Logical Flaws

The first flaw in those type of arguments is simply because someone does not like me does not make my statements false. This is a classic Argumentum Ad Hominem attack.

The second flaw in those type of arguments is that governments lie all the time, using their credibility to further their frauds unchallenged.

Irrefutable vidence

I knew because the American agents I was working with at the time confirmed MI5’s involvement and there were tonnes of evidence that I was specifically shown by one of the former who visited me in Sri Lanka around September 2000.

It was therefore the factual position.

Unlawful Operations by MI5 on UK Citizens

Actually I did find it difficult to believe at the time since because ‘MI5 would be effectively carrying out blatantly unlawful operations on UK citizens with absolutely no oversight‘ and in fact I said those very words to my colleague.

He replied “they do it all the time Joe, and they don’t care, so I suggest you stop caring and live somewhere else if you want to work with us.”

Accordingly I specifically named MI5 because it was MI5 who were overseeing the technical aspects of the unlawful intercepts for NCIS.

Sure, it may have been NCIS with their Black Ford Focus cars and a few obsessed HMCE officers taking time off work to harass me in Eckington from early August 2000 (and actually around March/April 2000 too), but the buck stopped with MI5.

Listening In

It was my intercepted conversations that kept them interested – sound familiar from 2015 onwards? Ha ha. In fact I always provide disinformation to those around me and especially on the phone because it is hilarious to see where the disinfo turns up and then I can track the intermediaries 🙂

Law Enforcement should simply interview me under caution should there be an actual issue – I’ll remember to wear underwear however 🙂

instead of this sad cloak and dagger approach which is extremely nauseating and which gets fools in Australia, Singapore and Sri Lanka all excited because they are part of a mission 🙂

At the time I could have easily disclosed the evidence to restore my credibility but I am not a squealer when it comes to matters of national security and military intelligence, so it was I that took the hit, and Rhodium PLC too of course.

Questions That Were Never Asked

But something that everybody missed and never explored are these questions:-

(a) ‘How DID Joe know from the mid-90s onwards that MI5 was planning a facility to monitor all email sent and received in Britain?’

(b) ‘How DID Joe know MI5 was hacking his systems and intercepting his calls in the late 90s?’

Virtually everyone in the world (including my cowardly Sri Lankan parents) simply accepted MI5’s FALSE NARRATIVE and that was the end of that…

28 November 2000 – UK The Register

The Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”) commenced strategies in the 1950s known as ‘Operation Mockingbird’ in which they manipulated the media:-

And of course JTRIG

Unsurprisingly it was not long before Kieren McCarthy of The Register wrote an inflammatory diatribe about me which was subtitled

‘Just because you’re paranoid’.

McCarthy’s ‘insulting piece of flawed bullshit‘ merely served to demonstrate the Igon Value Problem that many journalists suffer from, as well as the general lack of prescience about the real issues of Strong Encryption and Mass Electronic Surveillance.

After incorrectly labelling me with ‘Paranoid Schizophrenia’, McCarthy went onto the describe features of that label, and questioned the veracity of essentially everything associated with me.

I am really not sure how the fact that being right makes me paranoid, and that is more of the absurd logic that I see everywhere and it seems to be getting worse in 2017.

In any event I have dissected McCarthy’s garbage here:-

So Were Joe’s Theories About MI5’s Electronic Surveillance Right?

YES OF COURSE I WAS BLOODY RIGHT!

MI5 is the UK’s favourite homosexual employer, so each career starts with a BANG 🙂

No not Homer-sexual, but the picture is worth a thousand words 🙂

Joe’s Successful Strategies When Dealing With MI5 et cetera

(1) I focus my eyes on the target, rather than on my CO-WORKERS;

(2) I identify problems early and never COME FROM BEHIND;

(3) I go straight for the FRONT DOOR, rather they who enjoy DARK PASSAGES after using the TRADEMAN’S ENTRANCE;

(4) I enjoying keeping ABREAST of the situation rather than they who DELAY and then ENJOY HEAD on confrontations.

Eventual Release

When the following information CAME OUT OF THE CLOSET, it must have been a real BUMMER 🙂

“The investigatory powers tribunal, which is the only court that hears complaints against MI5, MI6 and GCHQ, said the security services operated an illegal regime to collect vast amounts of communications data, tracking individual phone and web use and other confidential personal information, without adequate safeguards or supervision for 17 years.”

Funny how the 17yrs before 17 October 2016 covers the EXACT PERIOD I was talking about!

“Humans are now merely objects of surveillance” – JSRDS

There are always Human Rights violations:-

GCHQ, MI5 and MI6 "unlawfully" collected data for over a decade

Perception Not Paranoia

So actually is it obvious that every time I get close to the truth and correctly identify covert surveillance, parties immediately circulate lies about me in a pathetic attempt to impede my progress and try to keep their DIRTY secrets safe.

The Psychiatric Facility Fraud of 17 December 2015 leveraged upon the 28 November 2000 article and so did some fake medicals that EDS produced against my wishes in 2001.

But thankfully I have Brains and Balls so ‘bring it on’ – because thanks to my memory I have plenty to say on those matters and it will be another humiliation for the agencies concerned 🙂

Further reading

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram CISSP FBCS MIEEE MIScT MINCOSE MACS Snr CP

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP